Page 1 of 2

Startup Vulnerability Assessment

How resilient is your venture? For each of the following 8 questions, honestly assess where your company falls.

1 - Financial Runway & Capital Efficiency

*

A

High Risk: Less than 6 months of runway; no clear path to extending it; heavily dependent on raising additional capital soon.

B

Concerning: 6-12 months of runway; preliminary fundraising plans but no strong commitments; high burn rate relative to revenue.

C

Moderate: 12-18 months of runway; active fundraising conversations; some flexibility to reduce burn if needed.

D

Stable: 18-24 months of runway; good investor relationships; clear levers to extend runway if fundraising environment changes.

E

Excellent: 24+ months of runway or cash flow positive; capital-efficient business model; not dependent on external funding for survival.

2 - Product-Market Fit Validation

*

A

High Risk: Still pre-launch or minimal user data; product hypothesis not validated with paying customers; high levels of churn.

B

Concerning: Some early users but inconsistent engagement; feedback is mixed; unclear if problem being solved is truly urgent.

C

Moderate: Growing user base with some evidence of product value; some customers experiencing "must-have" benefits; reasonable retention metrics.

D

Stable: Strong evidence of product solving a real problem; consistent user growth; good retention metrics; repeat purchases or usage.

E

Excellent: Clear, measurable evidence of strong product-market fit; exceptional retention; growing through word-of-mouth; customers would be disappointed if product disappeared.

3. Business Model Clarity & Unit Economics

*

A

High Risk: No clear business model; unit economics unknown or deeply negative; no clear path to profitability.

B

Concerning: Business model defined but untested; unit economics appear challenging; long payback period on customer acquisition.

C

Moderate: Working business model with some proof points; unit economics understood but still being optimized; path to profitability requires scale.

D

Stable: Proven business model with healthy unit economics; reasonable customer acquisition costs relative to lifetime value; clear path to profitability.

E

Excellent: Strong, proven business model with excellent unit economics; profitable or near-profitable on a unit basis; scalable acquisition channels identified.

4. Team Composition & Alignment

*

A

High Risk: Significant gaps in team capabilities; founder conflicts or misalignment on vision; high turnover; no advisory support.

B

Concerning: Some key roles unfilled; occasional team alignment issues; limited outside expertise or support.

C

Moderate: Core team capabilities present; generally aligned vision; some mentorship or advisory relationships.

D

Stable: Strong, complementary team with necessary expertise; good alignment on vision and strategy; solid advisory network.

E

Excellent: Exceptional team with proven track record; perfect alignment on vision and execution; strong mentors and advisors actively engaged.

5. Market Conditions & Competitive Landscape

*

A

High Risk: Highly saturated market; dominant competitors with significant advantages; market size constrained or shrinking.

B

Concerning: Crowded market with several well-funded competitors; differentiation challenging; market dynamics uncertain.

C

Moderate: Competitive but navigable landscape; clear differentiation potential; stable or growing market.

D

Stable: Limited direct competition; strong differentiation; growing market with clear opportunities.

E

Excellent: Blue ocean opportunity or significant competitive advantage; large and rapidly growing market; timing advantageous.

6. Operational Execution & Adaptability

*

A

High Risk: Frequently missing targets; slow to adapt to changes; poor prioritization; limited learning from failures.

B

Concerning: Occasionally meeting targets; reactive rather than proactive; limited processes for capturing and applying learnings.

C

Moderate: Generally meeting targets; able to adapt when needed; learning systems in place.

D

Stable: Consistently strong execution; proactive adaptation; good systems for continuous improvement.

E

Excellent: Exceptional execution capability; highly adaptive; systematic approach to learning and improvement.

7. Sales & Go-to-Market Effectiveness

*

A

High Risk: No repeatable sales process; customer acquisition highly unpredictable; marketing effectiveness unknown.

B

Concerning: Early sales mostly through founder relationships; customer acquisition process still being defined; inconsistent marketing results.

C

Moderate: Emerging sales process with some repeatability; customer acquisition channels identified but not fully optimized; marketing showing measurable results.

D

Stable: Proven, repeatable sales process; efficient customer acquisition channels; effective marketing strategy.

E

Excellent: Highly efficient sales engine; multiple successful acquisition channels; marketing ROI clearly positive.

8. Pivot Readiness

*

A

High Risk: No alternative hypotheses explored; deeply invested in current approach; limited resources for change.

B

Concerning: Limited exploration of alternatives; high switching costs to change direction; team resistant to major changes.

C

Moderate: Some alternative approaches considered; moderate ability to change direction; team open to adjustments.

D

Stable: Multiple strategic options maintained; good ability to shift direction if needed; team embraces learning and adaptation.

E

Excellent: Continuous exploration of alternatives; highly efficient at testing new directions; team culture embraces change as opportunity.

Anything Else You'd Like to Share About your Startup's Situation?

Stay in the loop to receive our Builders Field Guide and other important news and insights from Builders + Backers. Sign up by sharing your email with us!

Untitled multiple choice field

A

Yes, sign me up

*

B

No, thanks