Generative AI (GAI) Copyright Risk Checker (CRC) Tool

Welcome to the Copyright Risk Checker (CRC) Tool!

This tool assists GAI developers and creators in evaluating both input and output for copyright compliance. Answer questions to gauge potential risks in AI-generated content, and receive guidance to ethically navigate copyright laws. Your dedication ensures responsible GAI development that respects creators' rights. Start now to enhance your awareness and understanding of copyright principles in the digital realm.

Type of Outputted Work:

To what extent is the GAI output generated from sufficiently original and creative content?

A

High: Demonstrates high originality and creativity, minimising the risk of copyright concerns.

B

Moderate: Shows moderate originality, with potential for minor similarities to existing content.

C

Low: Displays limited originality, raising potential copyright risks.

How well have you determined the degree of human input and contribution to the GAI generation process?

A

High: Clear attribution and understanding of human-AI roles, reducing ambiguity.

B

Moderate: Some attribution clarity, but roles may need further clarification.

C

Low: Ambiguous attribution, leading to uncertainty about human-AI contributions.

How effectively have you identified any existing copyrighted works that may have influenced the GAI output?

A

High: Thorough identification of potential influences, minimising copyright risks.

B

Moderate: Some influences acknowledged, with potential for overlooked content.

C

Low: Limited identification of potential influences, raising significant risks.

How comprehensively have you assessed the risks associated with using copyrighted data for training the GAI model?

A

High: Comprehensive risk assessment and mitigation strategies in place.

B

Moderate: Partial risk assessment with room for further analysis.

C

Low: Limited risk assessment, posing potential legal and ethical concerns.

How well are you aware of the potential legal challenges related to AI-generated content?

A

High: In-depth awareness of legal challenges, ensuring proactive compliance.

B

Moderate: Moderate awareness of legal challenges, with room for improvement.

C

Low: Limited awareness of legal challenges, raising potential issues.

To what extent have you considered the potential moral and ethical implications of your AI-generated content?

A

High: Thorough consideration of ethical implications, guiding responsible AI development.

B

Moderate: Some consideration of ethical implications, with potential for further analysis.

C

Low: Limited consideration of ethical implications, posing ethical concerns.

How thoroughly have you reviewed relevant copyright laws and regulations in your jurisdiction?

A

High: In-depth review of copyright laws, ensuring compliance and minimising risks.

B

Moderate: Moderate review of copyright laws, with potential for further understanding.

C

Low: Limited review of copyright laws, raising potential legal issues.

How much are you using AI-generated content in a way that respects the rights of the original creators?

A

High: Strong adherence to rights of original creators, respecting intellectual property.

B

Moderate: Some adherence, with potential for better alignment with creator rights.

C

Low: Limited respect for creator rights, posing potential copyright violations.

How deeply have you considered the potential impact of AI-generated content on existing related markets or industries?

A

High: Thorough consideration of market impact, with strategies to mitigate disruptions.

B

Moderate: Some consideration, with room for further analysis of potential impacts.

C

Low: Limited consideration of market impact, raising potential challenges.

How extensively have you sought legal advice or consulted professionals for copyright-related concerns related to AI-generated content?

A

High: Extensive consultation with legal professionals, ensuring compliance and guidance.

B

Moderate: Moderate consultation, with potential for more legal insights.

C

Low: Limited consultation, raising potential for legal risks.