 Hi 👋 

Empático

I tend to question conventional frameworks and explore unconventional approaches

I prefer adapting solutions I've already tested and following structures I know work

I prefer starting by better understanding the context and study participants before defining hypotheses and objectives

I'm more comfortable starting from predefined hypotheses, data, or conceptual frameworks, leaving contextual understanding for later

I first think about creating an environment where people can express themselves freely and deeply

I first focus on clearly defining what to measure/validate and how to do it precisely

I allow myself to adjust the structure if I see things aren't working

I prefer sticking to a coherent, stable design from the beginning

I adapt my interaction based on what I feel the other person needs, even if inconsistent across sessions

I maintain consistent interaction even if the person's tone/situation changes during the session

I improvise on the fly and redirect based on what's happening

I prefer having prepared alternatives to follow a pre-planned Plan B

) I start by looking for clear, repeated patterns that can be synthesized

I try to understand results from participants' experiences before categorising their responses

) I enjoy finding unexpected connections, even if they don't fit the conclusion structure

I need to organise information with clear logic before interpreting

Before deciding, I consider how it might affect the people involved

I look for unexpected alternatives or different perspectives to see beyond the obvious

I focus on following rigorous methods to filter noise or validate observations