Page 1 of 1

Lighthouse Stylus

Walkthrough demonstration — participant feedback form.
Takes ~3–4 min to complete, 6 sections, anonymous.
No right or wrong answers. Your impressions of the concept matter more than technical detail.
Responses are collected anonymously to evaluate the Lighthouse Stylus concept as part of a walkthrough demonstration study. No personally identifiable information is stored. Data will be used solely for academic research and may be included in publications in aggregated, anonymised form. Participation is voluntary and you may stop at any time.

01 Background

Age range

Occupation / field

CAD / CAM experience

CAD / CAM experience
A
B
C
D
E

VR / AR experience

VR / AR experience
A
B
C
D
E

3D printing / fabrication experience

3D printing / fabrication experience
A
B
C
D
E

Projection-based interface experience

Projection-based interface experience
A
B
C
D
E

02 Perceived Utility

The stylus interaction concept addresses a genuine problem in CAD/CAM workflows.

The stylus interaction concept addresses a genuine problem in CAD/CAM workflows.
Strongly disagreeStrongly agree

I can see clear benefits over existing input devices (mouse, touchscreen, traditional stylus).

I can see clear benefits over existing input devices (mouse, touchscreen, traditional stylus).
Strongly disagreeStrongly agree

The projection-based interface adds meaningful value to the experience.

The projection-based interface adds meaningful value to the experience.
Strongly disagreeStrongly agree

This approach could meaningfully reduce friction in early-stage design.

This approach could meaningfully reduce friction in early-stage design.
Strongly disagreeStrongly agree

The concept feels technically feasible to deploy in a realistic setting.

The concept feels technically feasible to deploy in a realistic setting.
Strongly disagreeStrongly agree

03 CAD/CAM Demo

The demonstration clearly communicated what the tool does.

The demonstration clearly communicated what the tool does.
Strongly disagreeStrongly agree

The workflow shown felt intuitive and logical.

The workflow shown felt intuitive and logical.
Strongly disagreeStrongly agree

The integration between physical stylus and projected interface was convincing.

The integration between physical stylus and projected interface was convincing.
Strongly disagreeStrongly agree

The demonstrated capabilities matched my expectations based on the introduction.

The demonstrated capabilities matched my expectations based on the introduction.
Strongly disagreeStrongly agree

04 Adoption Intent

Likelihood to use in your own work

Likelihood to use in your own work
Strongly disagreeStrongly agree

Likelihood to replicate / build upon this

Likelihood to replicate / build upon this
Strongly disagreeStrongly agree

Contexts you could imagine using this (select all that apply)

Contexts you could imagine using this (select all that apply)

05 Development Priorities

Rank these development directions by importance to you (most important first)

Rank these development directions by importance to you (most important first)
1
1
1
1
1

06 Open-Ended Impressions

What did you find most valuable or compelling?

Concerns, limitations, or missing features?

How does this compare to tools you currently use?

Other thoughts or suggestions