Page 1 of 1
MEL pulse check: Your perspectives on MEL
What type of organization do you work for
*
Which best describes your current role
*
I engage with MEL/evaluations because...
*
I engage with it because it is mandated
I engage with it because I see value in it
A little bit of both
MEL
Independent evaluations
How "valuable" have you found MEL so far? ("Valuable", i.e., value-add is worth the time, effort, and resources involved)
*
0
1
2
3
4
5
Low
High
How "meaningful" have you found MEL so far? ("Meaningful", i.e., provides relevant and actionable insights on issues/ questions that matter to your program, team, or organization)
*
0
1
2
3
4
5
Low
High
How "useful" have you found MEL so far? ("Useful", i.e., Helpful in improving your programs/ portfolios/ orgs, or deciding what to do differently)
*
0
1
2
3
4
5
Low
High
Which one (MEL or independent evals) would you rate higher in terms of usefulness, meaningfulness, and value-add?
*
A
MEL
B
Independent Evaluations
C
Wouldn't pick one over another on usefulness or value-add
How often have you felt that MEL/evaluation made little to no difference to your program/portfolio? (Be honest)
*
0
1
2
3
4
5
Never
Very often
Very briefly, as a manager/ leader, share how can MEL/evaluations be optimized to serve you, your program/s, and teams better
How would you rate the quality of MEL and/or evaluation experts that you have worked with?
*
1 stars
2 stars
3 stars
4 stars
5 stars
To what extent do you agree: "MEL creates reporting burden"
*
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Fully disagree
Fully agree
To what extent do you agree: "MEL or evaluations don't tell us anything we already don't know"
*
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Fully disagree
Fully agree
To what extent do you agree: "MEL / evaluation products can somtimes be too technical/ theoretical/ jargony"
*
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Fully disagree
Fully agree
Last question: have you EVER had to push back on MEL / evaluation findings because you didn't agree with the data interpretation or findings? (be honest)
*
A
Yes
B
No
Submit