Page 1 of 1

Global Panel: Should the function of architecture be protected?

I’ve been thinking about something RIBA President Chris Williamson said in our recent podcast episode. He’s allowed his registration with the ARB to lapse, meaning he can no longer legally call himself an architect, a move he made in protest - arguing that protecting the title "architect" is a hollow gesture if we don’t protect the actual function of the work.

As we look towards the future of the profession, I wanted to ask you: should the function of architecture be protected?

Should the function of architecture be protected?
Untitled multiple choice field
A
B

Can you explain why you think this?

First Name

Last Name

Job Title (for new panellists only)

Company Name (for new panellists only)

Your professional headshot (for new panellists only)