Apply to become an AIGovLayer founding design partner

AIGovLayer helps governance teams turn fragmented AI records, evidence gaps and approval work into accountable actions, current evidence and defensible decisions. We are selecting a small number of organisations for controlled design-partner pilots. The programme is intended for organisations that already have AI systems, copilots, AI-enabled SaaS or Shadow AI usage and want a more operational governance process. Please do not submit confidential information, credentials, personal data relating to AI-system subjects or production evidence through this form.

Contact information

What is your full name?

What is your work email address?

Which organisation do you represent?

Which option best describes your role?

Please describe your role.

Where is your organisation primarily based?

Organisation and AI landscape

Approximately how many employees does your organisation have?

Which industry best describes your organisation?

Please describe your industry.

Approximately how many AI systems, copilots or AI-enabled applications are currently used or being assessed?

Which statement best describes your current AI-governance maturity?

We are only beginning to define an approach.

We maintain an inventory, but governance is mainly manual.

We perform risk assessments, but evidence and follow-up are fragmented.

We have policies and controls, but execution varies across teams.

We have a formal governance process and want stronger evidence and reporting.

We are preparing for an internal audit, customer review or certification.

Unsure.

Which tools currently support your AI-governance process?

Please name the other tool or approach.

Governance problems

Which AI-governance challenges are most important for you now? Select up to three.

Please describe the other challenge.

Briefly describe how AI-governance work is currently managed in your organisation. For example: spreadsheets, GRC workflows, SharePoint evidence, Jira actions, committees or external consulting.

What is the most costly, risky or frustrating gap in your current AI-governance process?

Potential pilot

Which starting point would create the most value for your organisation?

One critical AI system

A small portfolio of 3–10 AI systems

Shadow AI discovery intake and triage

Evidence-gap and remediation workflow

Formal review and approval workflow

Portfolio and board reporting

ISO/IEC 42001 preparation

We need help selecting the starting point

When would you realistically be able to begin a controlled pilot?

Is there an internal person who could sponsor or own a pilot?

Could your organisation provide representative, non-sensitive pilot information?

Which design-partner activities could your team support?

A 45-minute workflow discovery session

Testing the application with a representative use case

Providing structured usability feedback

Reviewing proposed reports and governance outputs

Participating in two or three short feedback sessions

Considering a paid pilot if the initial fit is demonstrated

What outcome would make a pilot successful for your organisation? Examples: faster evidence collection, clear ownership, fewer unresolved actions, better board reporting or improved audit readiness.

Commercial and follow-up context

What role would you have in evaluating or adopting AIGovLayer?

What would you prefer as the next step?

Book a product demonstration

Discuss a design-partner pilot

Receive the design-partner information first

Receive occasional product updates

Is there anything else we should understand before contacting you?

I agree that AIGovLayer may use the information submitted here to evaluate this application and contact me about a demonstration or design-partner opportunity.

I agree

I would also like to receive occasional AIGovLayer product and AI-governance updates.

Yes, please!