Page 1 of 2

Eyeball Publishing Lab - Professional Survey on Human Creative Contribution and Digital Provenance in AI-Assisted Works

As the use of artificial intelligence technologies in professional activities continues to expand, there is an increasing need to substantiate meaningful human creative contribution and to verify AI-assisted creative works. However, broadly accepted professional criteria for such assessment have not yet emerged.

We are conducting an independent research study to determine what types of evidence and what accompanying digital information the professional community considers necessary for:
substantiating meaningful human creative contribution;
identifying the initially declared digital object.

We would greatly appreciate it if you could share this questionnaire with colleagues working in law, information technology, and other professional fields related to the use of artificial intelligence.

What is your primary professional field?

Law / Copyright / Intellectual Property / AI Law / Digital Law

Information Technology / AI / Software Development / Digital Forensics / Information Security

Other professional field

What types of evidence do you believe may be necessary to substantiate meaningful human creative contribution in an AI-assisted creative work?

You may select one or more options

Documented materials reflecting the author's interactions with an artificial intelligence system.

For example, records of interactions with AI that make it possible to trace the collaborative process between the author and the artificial intelligence system.

Author's explanation of the creative process.

For example, the author's description of their role, creative decisions, and the manner in which artificial intelligence was used during the creation of the work.

Third-party report assessing the extent of human creative contribution.

For example, a report prepared by an independent third party assessing the extent of human creative contribution based on the analysis of the submitted materials.

Please specify what other evidence may be useful.

What information do you believe should accompany an AI-assisted creative work to substantiate its digital provenance and enable the subsequent identification of the initially declared digital object?

You may select one or more options

Cryptographic identifiers of the work.

For example, hash functions (SHA-256, etc.) and other cryptographic values that make it possible to verify the identity of a specific digital file and determine whether it has been modified.

Digital file metadata.

For example, technical information about the file, including the date of creation, date of modification, file format, software used, and other file characteristics.

Related digital materials.

For example, source project files, previous versions of the work, revision logs, records of interactions with AI, and other digital materials associated with the creation of the work.

Eyeball Publishing Lab - Professional Survey on Human Creative Contribution and Digital Provenance in AI-Assisted Works

What is your primary professional field?

What types of evidence do you believe may be necessary to substantiate meaningful human creative contribution in an AI-assisted creative work?

Please specify what other evidence may be useful.

What information do you believe should accompany an AI-assisted creative work to substantiate its digital provenance and enable the subsequent identification of the initially declared digital object?

Please specify what other digital information may be useful.