State of Gross Pathology Technology — Practitioner Survey
Q1. What best describes your role?
*
Q2. How many years have you worked in gross pathology (in any role)?
*
Q3. What type of institution do you primarily work in?
*
Q4. How would you characterize the resource level of your gross room environment?
*
Q5. What is the general geographic/practice setting of your institution?
*
Q6. Approximately how many gross specimens does your lab process per day?
*
Q7. Which technologies are currently used in your gross room? (Check all that apply)
*
Q8. Are the tools you checked above integrated with your Laboratory Information System (LIS), EHR, etc, or do they operate as standalone systems?
*
Q9. Overall, how integrated are these technologies into your day-to-day gross room workflow (rather than used ad hoc)?
*
Q10. Which aspects of gross examination consume the most time or effort? (Select up to 3)
*
Q11. How consistent do you believe measurements and gross estimations (e.g. tumor necrosis percentage estimation) are between different practitioners in your lab?
*
Q12. How much cognitive burden do manual tasks (documentation, measurement, dictation) add to your gross room workflow?
*
Q13. Which challenges most affect efficiency or quality in the gross room? (Select up to 3)
*
Q14. What factors most limit adoption of new technology in your practice? (Select up to 3)
*
Q15. Which emerging technologies are you most interested in seeing developed for gross pathology? (Select up to 3)
*
Q16. How comfortable would you be relying on an AI-assisted tool for gross measurements or estimations, assuming appropriate validation?
*
Q17. In five years, which statement best describes your expectation for gross pathology (what you think will actually happen)?
*
Q18. Which statement best describes what you would want to see (your ideal outcome), if different from Q18?
*
Q19. (Open Response). What is one technology, capability, or workflow improvement you believe would most improve gross pathology over the next decade?
*