How strong is your fundraising volunteers practice? This short, evidence-based self-assessment scores your organisation against fundraising standards, shows where your biggest gaps are, and puts the most useful fixes first.
It takes about 10 minutes. Every question is optional, and the more you can share, especially real numbers and documents, the more accurate your result.
These are optional. If you can share a few, we can check your answers against real evidence and give you a sharper, more useful result:
Written volunteer role descriptions for fundraising positions
Person specifications linked to role descriptions
Evidence of needs analysis preceding role design
Volunteer recruitment plan or documented process
Sample recruitment communications (ads, emails, website pages)
Referral tracking data (internal vs external sources)
Volunteer survey data on motivations, if any
Evidence that recruitment/recognition is differentiated by motive
Induction/orientation program materials
VPM or coordinator role description
Policy handbook or documents shared with volunteers
Evidence of ongoing training opportunities
Recognition program documentation
Examples of recognition communications or events
Evidence of differentiated recognition by motive or tenure
Volunteer retention rate data (annual, ideally multi-year trend)
Exit interview records or summaries
Satisfaction survey instruments and results
Evidence of program changes driven by feedback
Evidence of volunteer inclusion in team processes (meeting invites, information access)
Supervisor training materials covering volunteer management
Volunteer feedback on relationship with paid staff
Volunteer role design documentation showing consideration of autonomy, relatedness, and/or competence dimensions
Evidence of differentiated recognition or supervision practice between generic support roles and skill-based/evaluable roles
Any internal survey, exit-interview, or reflection process addressing organisational support and turnover intention beyond simple engagement scores