Total Score

Streamline AI: AI Maturity Index

We have multiple AI tools embedded into our legal workflows and use them regularly as a team

A few people on the team use AI tools on their own, but it's informal and inconsistent

We're aware of AI tools but haven't meaningfully adopted any yet

Multiple work types — contract review, drafting, research, intake triage, and others

One or two use cases, mostly document-related

We haven't applied AI to any legal work in a structured way

Yes, we have a written policy that's been reviewed, approved, and communicated to the team

We have informal guidelines but nothing documented or formally approved

There's a designated owner — either within legal or as part of a cross-functional AI committee we participate in

It's loosely owned; usually, whoever raises an AI-related question handles it

We have a defined review process — data handling, retention, subprocessors, and contractual protections are all assessed before approval

We review it case by case but don't have a consistent framework

We haven't developed a formal process for evaluating AI tools from a privacy standpoint

Yes — we maintain a list of approved tools and actively discourage use of unapproved ones

We have a general sense but don't have a formal approved list

Honestly, we don't have full visibility into what people are using

AI is embedded into specific workflows — it's not a separate step, it's just part of how we work

We use AI tools separately from our core workflows, and it requires extra steps

AI isn't integrated into our workflows in any meaningful way yet

Yes, we have audit trail visibility for AI-assisted work

Sometimes, depending on the tool and how it was used

No, there's no traceability for AI-assisted outputs right now