Form cover
Page 1 of 5

District AI Readiness Tier Report™

You’ve identified a classroom-level signal.
This step maps the system behind it.

Across your district, AI use is already shaping:

• Instruction

• Student Work • Operations

The question is not whether it’s happening—it’s whether it’s defined, aligned, and protected.

This short diagnostic will identify:

• Where AI use is already occurring across your district

• Where expectations are undefined or inconsistent • Where scale introduces risk without structure

This is not a survey. It is a system-level diagnostic.

Takes less than 2 minutes. Begin below.


1. Does your district have a clearly defined and communicated position on AI use that staff can consistently reference?

1. Does your district have a clearly defined and communicated position on AI use that staff can consistently reference?
A
B
C

2. Is AI use explicitly aligned to district strategic goals (not just individual teacher experimentation)?

2. Is AI use explicitly aligned to district strategic goals (not just individual teacher experimentation)?
A
B
C

3. Are there shared expectations for how AI-assisted work is evaluated across classrooms?

3. Are there shared expectations for how AI-assisted work is evaluated across classrooms?
A
B
C

Where should we send your District AI Readiness Tier Report™?

This allows you to:

• Receive your full system classification • Access your district-level risk summary • Reference your results with leadership

Enter your email to continue

4. Does your district have a review process to evaluate AI tools before they are used with students or data?

4. Does your district have a review process to evaluate AI tools before they are used with students or data?
A
B
C

5. Do staff have clear guidance on what student information can and cannot be entered into AI tools?

5. Do staff have clear guidance on what student information can and cannot be entered into AI tools?
A
B
C

6. Are AI tools reviewed for FERPA/COPPA compliance before adoption or use?

6. Are AI tools reviewed for FERPA/COPPA compliance before adoption or use?
A
B
C

7. Has the district clarified where AI is permitted, restricted, or prohibited across learning tasks?

7. Has the district clarified where AI is permitted, restricted, or prohibited across learning tasks?
A
B
C

8. Are grading and assessment practices updated to account for AI-assisted work?

8. Are grading and assessment practices updated to account for AI-assisted work?
A
B
C

9. Do teachers have actionable guidance (not just awareness) on designing AI-assisted instruction?

9. Do teachers have actionable guidance (not just awareness) on designing AI-assisted instruction?
A
B
C

10. Is there a cross-functional team responsible for setting and maintaining AI expectations across the district?

10. Is there a cross-functional team responsible for setting and maintaining AI expectations across the district?
A
B
C

11. Is AI-related professional learning ongoing and structured (not optional or one-time)?

11. Is AI-related professional learning ongoing and structured (not optional or one-time)?
A
B
C

12. Does your district have a defined process to monitor AI use and respond to misuse or emerging risks?

12. Does your district have a defined process to monitor AI use and respond to misuse or emerging risks?
A
B
C

Most districts identify gaps in 3–5 of these governance areas, often without visibility at the leadership level.

• Policy & Direction • Instruction & Assessment • Data & Compliance • Oversight & Sustainability

Your results will show where your system is currently exposed.

13. Based on your responses, select the range that reflects how consistently AI expectations are defined and applied across your district.

13. Based on your responses, select the range that reflects how consistently AI expectations are defined and applied across your district.